i could give you a list of 14 benevolent dictators when i bet the only bad dictators that you can come up with are about 5, so it is not true that there are less benevolent dictators than there are bad dictators.

That is not completely true because if a decision is made fast then the action will take place faster which will allow the problem to be resolved faster. In a democracy it will take a very long time because people have to vote and the votes have to be counted.

A lot of people agreeing with the choice of the leader doesn't always work, because the people may not be educated enough to know what is best for the country. And the thoughts of the minority are not taken for consideration. Many times in a democracy leaders say what they know the people want to hear, this may not always be the best for the country and the leader may also be lying. Sometimes people also vote for leaders they may relate to, such as leaders from similar backgrounds.

if there is more people with bad intentions than there are people with good intentions the majority will cause the government to fail because the majority of the people want what is bad for the people. Also with majority rules, the minority is ignored causing peoples freedom to be less than the freedom that people of the majority have

Educating the people doesn't always work and isn't very efficient and can result in high crime rates, harsh punishments encourages the citizens not to break any laws and results in low crime rates.

education doesn't always work for some people because education and decision making are two different things. no matter how you educate someone they will either have a bad past or something causing their actions to be bad and harsh punishments can make them realize what is wrong and what is right. this is proven in many examples where people who have bad children send their children to prison for small amounts of time, when the kids return they change who they are and stop their bad actions

that is true but if in a democracy people don't receive harsh punishments they won't learn and they will repeat their bad actions, if someone learns their lessons from a harsh punishment they will learn and won't repeat their bad actions. some forms of parenting are the same, where parents punish their children because of their bad actions, these harsh punishments cause children to be more polite and not make bad decisions, government in some ways is a bigger scale of parenting

If there are less harsh punishments then people will commit more crimes since the punishment is less harsh while in a dictatorship people are will be more scared to commit crimes since the punishments are very harsh.

As I said before, your only thinking of bad dictatorships. There have been many successful dictatorships as there have been many failed democracies. When the power is put into the hands of a good dictator he knows what is best for the country and takes care of it, he makes good decisions which are stable and efficient.

Your only thinking bad dictatorships, there have been many good dictatorships just like there have been many bad democracies. Habib Bourguiba for example was a dictator who ruled Tunisia from 1957 to 1987. He lead the fight for Tunisia's independence from France. He became the first President of the Republic of Tunisia. During his rule women were granted the right to vote, polygamy was stopped, and the country moved from a one-party system to a multi-party system.

A dictatorship can be more stable than a democracy because in a democracy there is majority rules, if the minority has good intentions and the majority has bad intentions than bad decisions are made for the country. In a dictatorship on the other hand, if the dictator is good he will do good and keep the government stable.