Closing Statement: Overall, a dictatorship is better than a democracy because if the people have less say it is less likely to have government corruption because the people can’t make bad decisions for their country also it would help the government grow more rapidly since decisions are made faster. A Dictatorship would also have a lower crime rate as people are afraid of the harsh punishment by the government.

A dictatorship can be more stable than a democracy because in a democracy there is majority rules, if the minority has good intentions and the majority has bad intentions than bad decisions are made for the country. In a dictatorship on the other hand, if the dictator is good he will do good and keep the government stable.

that is true but if in a democracy people don't receive harsh punishments they won't learn and they will repeat their bad actions, if someone learns their lessons from a harsh punishment they will learn and won't repeat their bad actions. some forms of parenting are the same, where parents punish their children because of their bad actions, these harsh punishments cause children to be more polite and not make bad decisions, government in some ways is a bigger scale of parenting

education doesn't always work for some people because education and decision making are two different things. no matter how you educate someone they will either have a bad past or something causing their actions to be bad and harsh punishments can make them realize what is wrong and what is right. this is proven in many examples where people who have bad children send their children to prison for small amounts of time, when the kids return they change who they are and stop their bad actions

One of the reasons for why a dictator can be harsh is especially because he wants what is best for his country, although people may not see it that way, a dictator is still defending their country and can help shape a good future for their country

In dictatorships, laws are enforced better because they give harsh punishments. Harsh punishments can be bad because people who go against the law are hurt. With that being said citizens are less likely to go against the law again because they are scared of the punishment causing respect to the government.

if there is more people with bad intentions than there are people with good intentions the majority will cause the government to fail because the majority of the people want what is bad for the people. Also with majority rules, the minority is ignored causing peoples freedom to be less than the freedom that people of the majority have

http://www.businessinsider.com/most-succesful-dictators-2011-6#13-yumjaagiin-tsedenbal-1

i could give you a list of 14 benevolent dictators when i bet the only bad dictators that you can come up with are about 5, so it is not true that there are less benevolent dictators than there are bad dictators.

If everyone has the same amount of power with voting and rights the government is granting freedom to people who can't make decisions for themselves. If someone with bad intentions has the same power as someone with good intentions they will do bad for their country and wont be stopped as they have equal power.