Tancaner's Waterfall
A dictatorship is not stable because all the leaders do is make useless strict laws and torture people if they go even a little against it. For example, Hitler. He made really useless and strict laws that put a bad significance for him.
If a dictator wanted best for his country, he would not torture women for the little mistakes that they do and put some proper laws that would be more organized
Argument 2:
Democracy is clearly better than dictatorship because it is really rare that we can hope a good dictator comes around. This is a really hopeless situation and this clearly supports that democracy has more rights and people can be more comfortable. http://www.merriam-webster.com/
in this website, it shows the rights and the real meaning of democracy, it clearly give people rights and this clearly supports my statement.
I would like to respectfully see that list, please. And then I can know how many good dictators there are
Majority always wins, and we cannot trust and hope 1 dictator can be a good leader. This is really hopeless and there is so much hope in democracy because people know they are safe
I agree with Kareem and I want to add: There is a majority when it comes to political selections because if there is a lot of people agreeing with this choice of leader, you know it's a right choice
It's really rare that a good dictator comes for the country. The dictator usually feels good because he has full power so most of the dictators decide to do bad choices
This is the opening statement. This is made to clarify my writing.
Democracy clearly has more advantages than dictatorship. In Democracy, people are always happy and comfortable because they know they have rights and that they have a voice in the country and they can know they are living in a safe country. We can never trust 1 person to rule the whole country. Because his objective is to remain in power and doesn’t care a lot about the people.
