Hunter 8G

Closing statement:

To sum up, dictatorship is better than democracy because a dictatorship doesn’t has to be cruel, it is more efficient and all aspects are taken into consideration. A greedy ruler can happen in a democracy as well, not only dictatorship, a democracy generally emphasizes quantity over quality.

Even if power is spread out, there are still corruptions. To be majority, political parties bribe or cheat elections.

'Not every law that is made in democracy that is pleased by citizen was successful.'

Not every law that are made in democracy by citizens are successful. Some people might agree with a law but others might not. For example in South Korea, government is trying to make law that government can see people's phone and devices to prevent terrorists attacks. However most of people are disagreeing with because their privacy.

Not every dictators treat people harsh, and harsh rules can be beneficial for country because it causes less crime. Also because of harsh rules, government is stable, there is no opposing groups to government

Also, dictatorship doesn't need election to process.

When democracy is making a law, it has to pass many procedures to make a law, however in dictatorship, it takes less time to make a law or decide something.

Argument 2

Dictatorship is better because it is way more efficient than democracy. In democracy, it takes a lot of time and money for election, in 39th general election.It took 272 million dollars. Compare to that, dictatorship is a lot more efficient than democracy, because it has less options , it takes less time to process something.

Also there is some countries that do not give freedom of speech or publish. Some democracy governments stops them when it contains information that is against to them.

Not only democracy gives human rights to people, dictatorship can be also provide natural environment for the protection and right.