Hunter 8G

As I said before, in a dictatorship a dictator is not always bad he could be good and make good decisions to benefit his people and make them happy and also evolve the country. Dictators make all the decisions and that is much more faster and efficient for the government because it could rapidly keep growing as this link says http://occupytheory.org/list-of-pros-and-cons-of-dictatorship/ . While on the other hand in a democracy the people do get to make the decisions but that takes a lot of time due to voting and counting up votes. Even though there is a group of people making the decisions it will take them a long time since they have to argue about it and that could take a long time and if it does take a long time the people will get over the problem and it might not be useful anymore once the law is passed. Or on the other hand it will be so far fetched that the law wont help.

If there are less harsh punishments then people will commit more crimes since the punishment is less harsh while in a dictatorship people are will be more scared to commit crimes since the punishments are very harsh.

But there are people who do go to school and may vote for things that they have no clue about which will cause problems because out of every place there will be a percentage of these people.

Hitler was a bad and terrible dictator that is true but Hitler is not the only dictator out there, there are other dictators such as Augusto Pinochet of Chile or King Idris of Libya were two dictators who lead the country very well and shaped it for a better future.

http://occupytheory.org/list-of-pros-and-cons-of-democracy/

In this link it says that a democracy can go bad due to poor leadership, the minorities of people, and an inefficient and slow government system. As you are saying people do have more rights and may feel more comfortable but those rights can be taken to the extreme and can sometimes end up in breaking the law. Also if there can be poor leadership in the government because since people do have freedom of speech there will also be uneducated people who don't know what they would be voting for for the decision.

If majority always wins then what will happen to the minority? They will be left to go with others people decisions and they don't agree with it because they don't think it's the best thing to do.

That is not completely true because in our world there are always people with bad intentions and want to be the best. And in this case that could happen since the people do have a lot of freedom and can use it to there benefit.

That is not completely true because if a decision is made fast then the action will take place faster which will allow the problem to be resolved faster. In a democracy it will take a very long time because people have to vote and the votes have to be counted.

First of all, for a leader to be changed in a dictatorship it doesn't always have to result in violence. Secondly, it isn't always good if people have a lot of freedom because they can start going against certain things and start doing bad things that may affect and throw the government off. In a dictatorship the power is controlled so people have certain rights. If the leader is a good leader then the country will be led properly and the people will be happy with the government.

Argument 1: A dictatorship is better than a democracy because a dictatorship government has a faster and more efficient process for the system since one person is making the decisions. For example, if anything bad were to take place such as a war or a natural disaster the dictator will quickly come up with a solution that he or she believes will work and will carry out with it. While in a democracy it would take a very long time to gather all the votes and see what they are going to do. The government progresses very rapidly and no government officials have to argue for an agreement.